Discussion:
Rolleiflex 2.8C and Kodak Portra 400
CarlosMFreaza
2014-03-16 12:23:29 UTC
Permalink
The Kodak Portra 120 ISO 400 that replaced NC and VC versions has a
very small grain considering it's an ISO 400 film.
It was rainy, but you always find a moment and something to take a
photograph. I was often using the reliable 2.8C Xenotar last year and
this year from January; I think it deserves a rest after this roll:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172559944/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172539564/

Carlos
CarlosMFreaza
2014-03-22 11:57:11 UTC
Permalink
A lonely pine in the afternoon:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13312146873/

The SL35 E again, this time with the original box. It does not show
the best condition, but it's the original box...:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13311965625/

Carlos
Post by CarlosMFreaza
The Kodak Portra 120 ISO 400 that replaced NC and VC versions has a
very small grain considering it's an ISO 400 film.
It was rainy, but you always find a moment and something to take a
photograph. I was often using the reliable 2.8C Xenotar last year and
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172559944/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/13172539564/
Carlos
Loading...